Case Report


Modified Bascom cleft lift procedure for recurrent pilonidal disease

,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  

1 Professor, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine of the Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil

2 Staff of Colorectal Unit, School of Medicine of the Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil

3 Staff of Colorectal Unit, Gastroenterology and Coloproctology of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil

Address correspondence to:

Sthela M Murad-Regadas

MD, PhD, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Clinical Hospital, Federal University of Ceará, Av Atilano de Moura 430, 200, CEP 60810-180, Fortaleza, Ceará,

Brazil

Message to Corresponding Author


Article ID: 100006VAM08SR2024

doi: 10.5348/100006VAM08SR2024CR

Access full text article on other devices

Access PDF of article on other devices

How to cite this article

Murad-Regadas SM, Regadas FSP, Filho FSPR, de Mendonça Filho JJA, Pinheiro LC, da Cunha CMQ, da Penha CBR, Ferreira DG. Modified Bascom cleft lift procedure for recurrent pilonidal disease. Video J Clin Res 2024;3(2):1–3.

Abstract


Introduction: There are different surgical techniques to treat pilonidal disease. The one appropriate technique would be with shorter healing time and the lowest rate of recurrence.

Case Report: We present a case of a 29-year-old male with recurrent pilonidal disease underwent a modified Bascom cleft lift technique which is a rotation flap procedure with an off-midline closure.

Conclusion: The modified Bascom technique with primary closure and advancement flap for the treatment of complex pilonidal disease showed effective for this case of recurrent pilonidal disease.

Keywords: Cleft lift surgery, Pilonidal, Pilonidal surgery, Recurrence

Introduction


Pilonidal disease is an acquired infectious disorder of the gluteal cleft skin. Pathogenesis is observed in traumatized dilated follicles along the midline crease [1],[2]. Surgical treatment is standard in chronic pilonidal disease including open excision with secondary wound healing or excision with primary closure with or without the use of a flap [3],[4]. Modified Bascom cleft lift technique is an option for primary closure with superior approach with regard to long-term recurrence rate [5]. Video 1 is to demonstrate the modified Bascom cleft lift technique in the treatment of recurrent pilonidal disease.

Case Report


A 29-year-old male patient with a recurrent pilonidal disease after a previous submission to an open excision with secondary wound healing. Video 1 shows the modified cleft lift Bascom technique which consists of excision of the fistulous orifices, followed by primary closure outside the midline with advancement of a flap. The patient had three orifices including one near by the anal margin. Procedure had no intraoperative complications. After one week of postoperative period, the patient presented a wound dehiscence (1.0 cm) of the lower segment, involving only the epidermis and dermis requiring no treatment. There was complete wound healing after nine weeks from the procedure. No recurrence was observed within one year of follow-up period. The case report was previously approved by the hospital’s research ethics committee, and the participant gave his informed consent.

Video 1: Modified Bascom cleft lift procedure for recurrent pilonidal disease. Step-by-step of the technique.

Share Video

Access video on other devices

Discussion


The principles for treatment of the primary and persistent disease are similar, requiring eradication of the sinus tract; complete healing of the overlying skin and prevention of new recurrence [3],[6]. Moreover, there is no consensus about the best surgical technique for the treatment of chronic pilonidal disease, as well as a primary or failed disease [3],[5],[6]. There are different types of procedures for pilonidal disease and according to the surgeon’s experience, characteristics of the patient and the recurrent pilonidal diseases; the most appropriate technique is chosen [3],[6]. Some techniques of flap reconstruction have been used in the treatment of failed/recurrent pilonidal disease with flap [1],[2],[5],[7],[8]. Studies have demonstrated excellent results (96.1% healed after one cleft lift) using the modified Bascom cleft lift procedure. The most common complication is a 2–3 mm separation of the lower portion of the wound, which involved the epidermis and dermis, and required no treatment other than having the patient keep it clean and dry [7],[8].

Conclusion


The modified Bascom technique with primary closure and advancement flap for the treatment of complex pilonidal disease showed effective for this case of recurrent pilonidal disease and the patient returned his activities in nine weeks.

References


1.

Bascom J, Bascom T. Failed pilonidal surgery: New paradigm and new operation leading to cures. Arch Surg 2002;137(10):1146–50. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

2.

Bascom J, Bascom T. Utility of the cleft lift procedure in refractory pilonidal disease. Am J Surg 2007;193(5):606–9. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

3.

Enriquez-Navascues JM, Emparanza JI, Alkorta M, Placer C. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing different techniques with primary closure for chronic pilonidal sinus. Tech Coloproctol 2014;18(10):863–72. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

4.

Doll D, Orlik A, Maier K, et al. Impact of geography and surgical approach on recurrence in global pilonidal sinus disease. Sci Rep 2019;9(1):15111. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

5.

Immerman SC. The Bascom cleft lift as a solution for all presentations of pilonidal disease. Cureus 2021;13(2):e13053. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

6.

Johnson EK, Vogel JD, Cowan ML, Feingold DL, Steele SR; Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. The American Society of colon and rectal surgeons’ clinical practice guidelines for the management of pilonidal disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2019;62(2):146–57. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

7.

Gendy AS, Glick RD, Hong AR, et al. A comparison of the cleft lift procedure vs wide excision and packing for the treatment of pilonidal disease in adolescents. J Pediatr Surg 2011;46(6):1256–9. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

8.

Senapati A, Cripps NP, Flashman K, Thompson MR. Cleft closure for the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease. Colorectal Dis 2011;13(3):333–6. [CrossRef] [Pubmed]   Back to citation no. 1  

Supporting Information


Author Contributions:

Sthela M Murad-Regadas - Substantial contributions to conception and design, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published

F Sergio P Regadas - Substantial contributions to conception and design, Interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Final approval of the version to be published

F Sergio P Regadas Filho - Substantial contributions to conception and design, Interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Final approval of the version to be published

Jose Jader Araujo de Mendonça Filho - Substantial contributions to conception and design, Interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Final approval of the version to be published

Laryssa C Pinheiro - Substantial contributions to conception and design, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published

Carlos Magno Queiroz da Cunha - Substantial contributions to conception and design, Interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Final approval of the version to be published

Camila B R da Penha - Substantial contributions to conception and design, Drafting the article, Final approval of the version to be published

David G Ferreira - Substantial contributions to conception and design, Drafting the article, Final approval of the version to be published

Data Availability Statement:

The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.

Consent For Publication:

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this article.

Competing Interests:

Authors declare no conflict of interest.